ABSTRACT
To compare the efficacy and safety of cetuximab biweekly regimen with those of standard weekly regimen as a first-line therapy of KRAS/RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer. Methods: Patients who received weekly or biweekly administra-tion of cetuximab plus FOLFOX/XELOX as a first-line therapy from July 2010 to December 2017 in Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences were retrospectively screened for eligibility. Objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and frequencies of adverse events (AEs) between the two groups were compared. Results: Of 152 eligible patients, 55 were in the biweekly group and 43 were in the weekly group. The biweekly group had significantly higher ORR than the weekly group (76.3% vs. 54.8%, P=0.025). Median PFS in the biweekly and weekly groups were 10.3 and 8.8 months, respectively (P=0.288), and the median OS were 33.5 and 27.4 months, respectively (P=0.563). The two groups showed no significant difference in PFS and OS. For overall AEs, the biweekly group presented significantly more stomatitis (32.7% vs. 14.0% , P=0.032) and tended to show substantially more acne-like rash (80.0% vs. 62.8%, P=0.058) and leukopenia and/or neutropenia (72.7% vs. 55.8%, P=0.081). The frequency of 3/4 grade acne-like rash in the biweekly and weekly groups were 18.2% and 7.0%, respectively (P=0.105). The frequency of all grade 3/4 AEs between the two groups showed no significant difference (P>0.05). Conclusions: Biweekly regimen of cetuximab plus FOLFOX/XE-LOX had similar efficacy and higher ORR compared with those of standard weekly regimen. Cetuximab administered biweekly may be an optional choice in clinical practice, with close attention paid to increased frequency of certain AEs.
ABSTRACT
Objective@#To evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of biweekly paclitaxel and platinum chemotherapy followed by surgery for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.@*Methods@#We retrospectively analyzed the clinicopathological data of 20 patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma treated in our hospital between January 2012 and March 2016. All patients received biweekly paclitaxel and platinum chemotherapy followed by surgery.@*Results@#20 cases received preoperative chemotherapy for 3-8 cycles with an average of 4 cycles. The main chemotherapy-related adverse events were bone marrow suppression (18/20, 90.0%), followed by vomiting and nausea (10/20, 50.0%). Five patients (25.0%) had grade 4 neutropenia and all toxicities were torlerable and manageable. After chemotherapy, all patients received surgery. The histological responses in the primary tumors were grade 1 in 13 (65.0%) patients, grade 2 in 7 (35.0%) patients, and grade 3 in 0 (0%) patient. None had disease progression. Downstaging of T-stage was observed in 5 cases (25.0%) after chemotherapy. Among them, 4 cases were with moderate histologicl responses and one case with mild histological response. The incidence of postoperative complications was 25.0%(5/20), and the complications were improved following symptomatic treatments. There was no treatment-related death.@*Conclusions@#Biweekly paclitaxel and platinum chemotherapy followed by surgery for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma is safe and effective. Further randomized clinical trial should be conducted to assess the value of this therapeutic regimen in the preoperative chemotherapy for esophageal cancer.
ABSTRACT
Objective:This study aims to determine the efficacy of chemotherapy and to identify potential chemotherapy agents for advanced primary duodenal carcinoma (PDC). Methods:Fifty-six patients with advanced PDC, who did and did not receive chemo-therapy, were involved in this study. Response rates (RR), disease control rates (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall sur-vival (OS) were analyzed. Results:The overall RR and DCR of 43 patients were 19.04%and 71.42%, respectively. The patients who re-ceived chemotherapy agents fluorourzcil and oxaliplatin exhibited higher RR compared with patients who received other chemotherapy combinations (35.29%vs. 7.69%, P=0.010 9). Palliative chemotherapy improved the OS of patients with advanced PDC compared with patients who did not receive chemotherapy (13.35 months vs. 5.65 months, HR=0.203, 95%CI:0.083 to 0.497, P=0.000 5). Compared with the use of other chemotherapy regimens, treatment with a fluorourzcil-based chemotherapy agent resulted in a longer PFS (5.08 months vs. 1.08 months, HR=0.004, 95%CI:0.000 to 0.315, P=0.013 2). Multivariate analysis indicated mucinous histology and lymph mode metastasis as factors predictive of poor prognosis in patients with advanced PDC. Conclusion:Palliative chemotherapy may im-prove the OS of patients with advanced PDC.
ABSTRACT
Objective:This retrospective study aims to determine the efficacy of chemotherapy and improve a salvage chemother-apy agent for metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC) after failure of treatment with irinotecan and oxaliplatin. Methods:Between Janu-ary 2002 and March 2013, 37 patients with metastatic MCRC who had progressed after treatment with irinotecan and oxaliplatin were analyzed for their response rate (RR) and progression-free survival (PFS). Results:The overall RR of the 37 patients was 13.51%, with 5 cases of partial response (PR), 12 cases of disease stabilization (SD), and 20 cases of progression (PD). Compared with other chemo-therapy regimens, treatment with a pemetrexed-based chemotherapy agent had a higher RR (17.64%vs. 10.00%, P=0.64) without a lon-ger PFS (2.00 months vs. 1.63 months, HR=0.79, 95%, CI:0.35 to 1.78, P=0.58). Compared with other chemotherapy regimens, treat-ment with a raltirexed-based chemotherapy agent had a higher RR (16.67%vs. 12.00%, P=0.34) without a longer PFS (1.58 months vs. 1.90 months, HR=2.24, 95%, CI:0.98 to 5.12, P=0.06).Conclusion:In patients with MCRC after failure of treatment with irinotecan and oxaliplatin, a pemetrexed-based or raltirexed-based chemotherapy agent may beneficial during salvage treatment and is therefore worthy of further study.